Stephenson, Matthews, Chávarri & Lambert, L.L.C. Attorneys at Law
Stephenson, Matthews, Chávarri & Lambert, L.L.C. Attorneys at Law
print page bookmark page email page english spanish french german 

News

Personal Injury

[06/11] Man feels fine after being shot in head by nailgun
[06/06] Pa. crews rescue nude man stuck in portable potty
[06/24] Brain injuries cause half of seniors' fall deaths

More...

Business

[06/11] Rude traveling salespeople evicted from Minn. hotel
[07/02] Fugitive hedge-fund swindler surrenders in Mass.
[06/30] Oil is making millionaires in North Dakota

More...

Immigration

[06/11] Red Sox slugger Ortiz sworn as US citizen
[06/27] ICE attorney arrested for alleged immigrant bribes
[06/27] Md. mom uses son's Iraq death to help change law

More...

Case Summaries

Immigration Law

[07/03] Al Yatim v. Mukasey
Palestinian Christians' petitions for review of denials of their applications for asylum and related relief, as well as a motion to re-open, are denied where: 1) the record did not compel a conclusion that the BIA erred in finding petitioners ineligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief; and 2) although the election of Hamas may cause increased difficulties for Christians in the Palestinian territories, petitioners failed to identify any additional difficulties they will face which would rise to the level of persecution.

[07/02] Rapheal v. Mukasey
In an immigration proceeding involving a petition for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture, a decision rejecting the claims for relief is reversed and the case remanded where petitioner's hearing before an IJ did not conform to statutory requirements insofar as she did not have a chance to review an Immigration Report admitted against her. Petitioner's challenges to the use of video conferencing for immigration proceedings are rejected.

[07/01] Kabba v. Mukasey
In an immigration proceeding, petition for review of a decision finding petitioner ineligible for both asylum, restriction on removal, and related relief is granted where the BIA did not appropriately review an IJ's earlier credibility determination under the clearly erroneous standard, as required by 8 C.F.R. section 1003.1(d)(3)(i).

More...


 
© Stephenson, Matthews, Chávarri & Lambert, L.L.C.
all rights reserved. disclaimer

Stephenson, Matthews, Chávarri & Lambert, L.L.C. Attorneys at Law